The Worldly Philosophers

1. How is scarcity and survival intertwined?

In the book, a man looks at survival a problem as a member of a society related with scarcity. The fact that he is still alive seems to prove that the man has solved the problem of survival, however, the scarcity, or existence of want and misery, seem to undermine  the solution to the problem. Scarcity of resources and people’s desire for more creates problem. Economics study the scarcity of resources in a society and studies the society’s survival or endurance relating scarcity to it.

2. What are advantages and disadvantages of the two ways societies have been organized in the past?

In the primitive society, the reality that opportunity cost of not working was death forced people to work and cooperate as a member of society. The advantage of this society is that it forces everyone to work. However, the disadvantage of it is a struggle between life and death.

In advanced society, only half of the population never does anything “productive,” such as working in factories or mines. The advantage of this society is that work is not a struggle for survival like in the primitive society. However, the disadvantage of the society is that if even a small portion of the “productive” work force performed poorly or refused to work, it would affect and dismantle the structure of the society.

3. Why was there no need for economists throughout most of history?

Throughout history, most of societies had traditional economy, which means that occupation is passed down to generations. With everybody having fixed work, there was no need for economics and economists for the society did not need them to comprehend their economy or social structure.

4. Why do you think the economic  revolution was so disturbing?

In a traditional society, everything was obvious; every men had their fixed occupation. However, the idea of market system had dubious and unclear aspects. So the revolution to settle market system in these societies would have been very disturbing as it dismantled the traditional social structure. Also, it might have added uncertainties to people’s roles or occupations.

Advertisements

1 Response so far »

  1. 1

    Dr Anthony said,

    Well done Sang, good responses. I especially like your answer to question 4, clearly expressed.


Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: